The first step of a typical Oracle | Primavera Risk (Pertmaster) Monte Carlo analysis is to import the file. This training session will outline how to import a project schedule into Pertmaster from a Microsoft Project plan (.mpp) file.
For this training example it is assumed that three-point estimates may need to be pushed back to Microsoft Project (MSP) for audits by government bodies such as the DCMA and DCAA. This may not always be necessary, however Microsoft Project is much more common on government projects than in other industries. The three-point estimates can be used by an auditor to replicate the answer in Pertmaster or in other risk analysis tools such as @Risk.
Before importing a Microsoft Project file for risk analysis, the Pertmaster toolbar should be added to Microsoft Project. The files can be imported directly into Pertmaster from the file menu, however, when dealing with sub-projects the import must come from within MSP with the master project schedule open. The toolbar will also give the user other important features directly in MSP such as a progress wizard to run prior to import.
Open Pertmaster and click File | Microsoft Project | Add Toolbars and Views to MS Project. A warning pop-up in Pertmaster will let the scheduler know that the default MSP template will be edited. Click yes.
The progress wizard simply ensures that Pertmaster reads in the data the way it was intended from Microsoft Project. Make certain to carefully select the correct options during the wizard, as the schedule import relies on this. Many of the changes can be accomplished by progressing the project and subproject files to time now via Tools | Tracking | Update Project in Microsoft Project. The progress wizard will conclude with a summary of the changes. Once the progress wizard has been completed, the file may be imported into Pertmaster.
For audit purposes the risk ranges (minimum, most likely, and maximum) may have been loaded in MSP. Schedulers may have also chosen to load each activity with a three-point estimate. Occasionally users may have these situations, however it is most common for no risk information will be loaded in the Microsoft Projecct schedule. The templates in Pertmaster provide users with some powerful and time-saving features for risk loading. If the fields are not brought in upon import, then the user will be required to re-import the Microsoft Project (.mpp) file.
Import Mappings General Tab:
Import Mappings Tasks Tab:
Import Mappings Probabilistic Tab:
Import Mappings Resources and Costs Tab:
Import Mappings User Defined Fields Tab:
Users can export a Pertmaster plan as a Microsoft Project (.mpp) file. The export option is listed under the path File | Microsoft Project. The file will be created directly from Pertmaster. Microsoft Project will need to be installed on the machine to create an export from Pertmaster. This is usually not a desirable option as it will completely rewrite the file based on Pertmaster’s CPM scheduling engine and options. Although the file will be reasonably clean it is still not advisable in most situations due to small differences in the scheduling engines.
The risk ranges, or other information, can be imported back into the Microsoft Project schedule so that analysis can be run and audited using different risk products. The process can be somewhat difficult because multiple versions of the MSP schedule may be used. The basic process will be:
It is only necessary to replace the file if the time now version of the schedule has different remaining durations than the original file due to the progress wizard. The time now version could be considered the new working file, however some companies choose to use % complete in Microsoft Project to track earned value which edits the remaining duration field. This is not a recommended way to update earned value as the % complete field is actually the duration % complete field. It seems to be a common issue that the true remaining duration is allowed to be edited in order to track earned value to push to products like Cobra. There will be mismatches between the true risk ranges and the remaining durations in Microsoft Project in these situations. If earned value isn’t a concern in the audit file, then the time now version of the schedule should be used and no file replacements are needed.
To update the file:
Copyright © 2024 PRC Software. All rights reserved
This will close in 0 seconds
This will close in 0 seconds
The PRC Enterprise Risk Register is a web-based risk management software solution which allows for the tracking of risk at the project and portfolio level. Audit logs for all risk updates and changes are available at the click of a button to aid with audits, claims and the flow of information. The power of the PRC Enterprise Risk Register is in the simplicity of the user interface, which is designed to navigate easily at both project and portfolio levels without compromising functionality or data. The PRC Enterprise Risk Register allows for mapping across project levels so the data can be reported at the portfolio level, even if the work, risk and organizational breakdown structures are not standardized.
This will close in 0 seconds
The PRC Enterprise Cost Risk Analysis is a customizable web-based solution for simulating estimate cost and determining cost contingency, cost drivers, and risk hotspots. The key to a good risk analysis is good inputs. The software cannot be a roadblock to success. Good risk software should be easy on the end user. Monte Carlo simulation is already a complex. The software should simplify the process.
This will close in 0 seconds
The PRC Enterprise Schedule Risk Analysis is a customizable web-based solution for simulating schedule duration and dates. At PRC Software, we believe that the key to good risk software is through good inputs and excellent user friendliness. A Monte Carlo simulation is already a complex. The software should not be complicated as well.
This will close in 0 seconds
PRC specializes in risk analysis, audit, and training. We have cross-industry experience in fields such as Aerospace & Defense, Oil & Gas, and Engineering & Construction. We believe that over-complicating the risk process often leads to wasted effort and poor results. Our goal is to "make it simple."
This will close in 0 seconds